×

1
2

Presearch: Your Privacy, Our Priority!Announcements (self.Presearch)

submitted by Haunterblademoi[M]

sorted by:
best
topnewcontroversialoldq&a
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]M1k3_777 -1 points0 points  (19 children)

Is this article false?

https://digdeeper.club/articles/search.xhtml#presearch

[–]Haunterblademoi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know where you got that article from but that's not from Presearch, For security reasons it is better that you do not open it, The previous article had a typo and I have already corrected it.

[–]GeovyyAdmin (Official) 0 points1 point  (15 children)

That article is totally out of context

[–]PsychCrypto 0 points1 point  (7 children)

How so?

[–]Haunterblademoi[S] 0 points1 point  (6 children)

What that article says is incorrect, Presearch pays for the pre As long as you have used the search engine correctly

[–]PsychCrypto 0 points1 point  (5 children)

Did you read the whole thing? You're not open source, have a sketchy privacy policy, arbitrary withdrawal rules, and censored results.

[–]Haunterblademoi[S] 0 points1 point  (4 children)

He really have a wrong vision that person has, There is nothing arbitrary and the terms and conditions are clear, If a person uses the search engine only to obtain tokens then his account will be flagged, Presearch is not a farm, It is indeed not open source but I don't know what that has to do with what he is claiming, Additionally I will be at some point, And regarding censorship, Presearch currently uses results from different search engines, so if there is a censored result, it could be the source itself Where the information comes from, Later on, when Presearch has its own index, there will be much more transparency in that regard.

[–]PsychCrypto 0 points1 point  (3 children)

Read the description of this sub. You don't understand why it's important that you're NOT open source? It's all a lie!

[–]Haunterblademoi[S] 0 points1 point  (2 children)

Well I didn't read it all because obviously the person is talking about scams, things that are not correct, And it specifically emphasizes rewards that Presearch does not pay, which is also not correct, So it is evident that it is not aligned with the project.

[–]PsychCrypto -1 points0 points  (1 child)

So you won't even read it all? You can't be serious. Open your eyes!

[–]Haunterblademoi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure 👍

[–]M1k3_777 0 points1 point  (6 children)

I just want to know if it's garbage or not? I saw it on a SimpleX chat group.

[–]Haunterblademoi[S] 0 points1 point  (5 children)

There are annoying users who tend to write anything

[–]PsychCrypto -1 points0 points  (4 children)

This annoying user seems to have done their research and is providing receipts

[–]Haunterblademoi[S] 1 point2 points  (3 children)

Which user are you talking about?

[–]PsychCrypto -1 points0 points  (2 children)

The one who wrote the article about your scam https://digdeeper.club/articles/search.xhtml#presearch

[–]Haunterblademoi[S] 0 points1 point  (1 child)

It's probably a person who cheated OR just used Presearch to get reward, Then he got upset because the anti-fraud system detected that he was doing token farming

[–]PsychCrypto 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read the article.

[–]PsychCrypto -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Presearch is a scam. The article lays it out well.